In a dramatic turn in Peruvian politics, the country’s Attorney General has requested an 18-month travel ban on former President Dina Boluarte.
This push comes just days after her removal from office, and it is tied to serious ongoing investigations into allegations of corruption, money laundering, and questionable benefits related to cosmetic surgeries during her tenure.
The court is poised to weigh these requests in hearings scheduled in mid-October 2025.
Prosecutors’ Requests: Dual Bans
Prosecutors have filed two distinct travel ban requests:
- An 18-month travel restriction linked to the cosmetic surgeries case, in which Boluarte is accused of benefiting improperly from medical services during her time in office.
- A separate request for up to 36 months in connection with a money laundering investigation, reportedly tied to a network known as “Los Dinámicos del Centro.”
If approved, these measures would prevent Boluarte from leaving Peru while investigations proceed.
Hearing Schedule & Process
The courts have set the following tentative dates:
- October 16, 2025 (08:00 Lima time) — Hearing for the 18-month request
- Around October 15, 2025 — Hearing for the 36-month request
Judges will examine whether there is sufficient probable cause, whether the investigations justify such restrictive measures, and whether Boluarte poses a flight risk or a threat to evidence integrity.
Political and Legal Context
Boluarte assumed the presidency in December 2022, following the ousting of her predecessor.
Her administration was racked by low public support, security issues, and persistent concerns about her conduct in office.
On October 10, 2025, Congress voted decisively to remove her from office on grounds of “permanent moral incapacity.”
Her abrupt exit has accentuated the legal and political spotlight now resting on her.
In Peruvian law, a judge can impose “impedimento de salida” (travel bans) during preliminary investigations.
These are intended to prevent suspects from fleeing and to protect the investigation process.
The dual requests underscore prosecutors’ intent to pursue multiple fronts in building their cases.
Summary of Key Details
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Requester | Attorney General’s Office |
| Target | Dina Ercilia Boluarte Zegarra |
| First Request | 18 months – Cosmetic surgeries case |
| Second Request | Up to 36 months – Money laundering case |
| Hearings Scheduled | Oct 16 for 18-month; ~Oct 15 for 36-month |
| Status | Requests filed, judge yet to decide |
| Removal from Office | Oct 10, 2025 – Congress vote |
| Allegations | Corruption, money laundering, illicit benefits |
Implications & Stakes
If the judge grants these bans, Boluarte would be legally barred from international travel while probed. That would limit her mobility and potentially strengthen prosecutorial leverage.
The outcome will also be a test of Peru’s commitment to rule of law and whether high-ranking officials can be held legally accountable.
The new interim government is under pressure to demonstrate transparency, restore public confidence, and facilitate the judicial process.
What Lies Ahead
The days following the mid-October hearings will be critical.
A court ruling will either uphold or deny the travel bans, shaping how Boluarte can respond. Additional legal measures—such as asset freezes or subpoenas—may be introduced as investigations deepen.
Meanwhile, political stability hinges on how the new leadership handles this high-profile legal confrontation.
Peru is now in the throes of a critical juncture.
The Attorney General’s push for an 18-month travel ban on Dina Boluarte—and potentially longer restrictions—reflects the urgency of serious accusations spanning corruption, money laundering, and misuse of benefits during her presidency.
As the courts deliberate in October, the decisions will not only determine Boluarte’s freedom of movement but also signal how Peru intends to deal with high-level accountability and uphold legal norms in turbulent political times.
